His dissertation is in book form here, published in 2021, and can be located online without cost. His doctoral dissertation is heavily footnoted, and alleges to completely translate the early texts "Chan essentials" and a few others from the 4th and 5th century, which are the earliest and only existing chan meditation manuals.
I haven't made my way through it but it seems to be an interesting and dense look at the spiciest debate on r/zen.
Here is his abstract:
This dissertation explores the development of Buddhist meditation in China between 400 and 600 CE. Although texts discussing Buddhist meditation were known in China from the end of the second century, only during this period did it become a commonly practiced form of Buddhist training, and did Indian meditation masters come to China in appreciable numbers. Focusing on a body of meditation texts written in China during the first half of the fifth century, I argue that Chinese Buddhists came to understand the practice and meaning of Buddhist meditation in relation to rituals of repentance, which during this time became the core of Buddhist liturgical life. Meditation was thought to produce a state of visionary sensitivity in which practitioners would obtain visions attesting to their karmic purity or impurity, and hence to either the success of or need for rituals of repentance.
Are these meditation manuals legitimate? Were they used in chan communities? If not, why the same name? Does this scholarship change how you interpret chan buddhism?
Submitted June 20, 2022 at 06:18AM by mindbrainhaver https://ift.tt/EJh5tRe
No comments:
Post a Comment