Deshan:
Everywhere you go, you look for people to say you are a member of the school of the Chan founder, but when you are questioned about the fundamental matter your mouths are like a wooden bolt, immediately shooting off about bodhi, nirvana, thusness, and liberation, extensively quoting the verbal teachings of the triplex canon, claiming this is Chan, this is the Way, fooling people at large.
What relevance has this? You are bringing our spiritual forbears into disrepute.
My perception is not that way. Here I have no Buddha and no Dharma. Bodhidharma was a smelly old foreigner; the Bodhisattva of the tenth stage are dung haulers; the equally and subtly enlightened are immoral worldings; bodhi and nirvana are donkey-tethering stakes; the twelve-part canonical teachings are ghost tablets; paper for wiping pus from sores; those who have attained the four fruitions, the three ranks of sages, and those from initial inspiration to the tenth stage, are ghosts haunting ancient tombs, unable to save even themselves; Buddha was an old foreigner, a piece of crap.
Good people, don't make the mistake of putting on a garment of sores.
Sutra spamming trolls? Cowards who fool people at large by associating Zen with your sacred texts that are really just pus rags and bodhi & nirvana doctrines.
Buddhists? Ghouls who can't help themselves but read ghost tablets and tie themselves up to a piece of crap.
"Zen Buddhists" don't study this, don't discuss this, and don't challenge each others understanding using this as an artillery piece. Sure, if they are in their zoom sitzkrieg church services...of course, hauling dung and putting on robes of sores is the game.
Here? Buddha is a piece of crap and Bodhidharma smelled funny.
Any questions?
Submitted September 07, 2020 at 09:28AM by ThatKir https://ift.tt/35jaxzs
No comments:
Post a Comment