Re: the presence of something always implies its opposite

Suppose you say,

Once X enters the discussion, the opposite of X, X' also enters the discussion

Very often the implication is that X'', the opposite of the opposite of X, is the same as X, conventionally, and this is a sufficient implicit reason to introduce X' this way, so the opposite of hot is cold, up is down, and so on.

It's a handy tool if duality has already been applied. But there would be no such thing as decontamination of duality if there were no cost to using this tool. This would be taking the other side.

If you throw out duality, then you have neither thrown it out nor not thrown it out. Duality has been thrown out for you: you get the wisk when you make a mess.

To each thought is attached a tag that says, "You could have been thinking something else, but you thought this instead". It means thought incurs a cost. You'll get less thinking this way. What does that do to time?

Very often force travels as duality's sidekick. That's a good enough reason to keep the high school kids in high school, in science class, where they belong!

Submitted January 30, 2020 at 08:30AM by dabfad https://ift.tt/2u3NmZP