Faulty premise?
Faith based religions and self-negating observance are both needed. Christianity and buddhism are a yin-yang. There is a middle in a circle.
Christians affirm god. Buddhism denies. Both are needed. The two work together. God is non-dual. God has to contain both for reality to be possible and duality to exist. The same is true for all religion. All are either based on belief or negation. Nothing else is possible except agnosticism and Zen/Tao. Both are middle paths.
In Christian terms what happened to this spark was that it had great faith and prayed all day every day to the glory of god the highest. It has become a vessel for the light of god to do his work.
In buddhism there is no self, no other, emptiness is reality. All thoughts of I are witnessed and seen to be false.
In agnostic terms, nothing happened, this is just here being for no reason at all.
In Zen/tao terms, everything flows. No need to worry or think about anything. Feel the flow and let it move.
This is the paradox of existence. God/nonbeing is in the middle, seeking nothing, having no thoughts of self, just being here now always as the infinite source of all. "There is only one god" now makes sense does it not? If jesus and buddha met they would agree to disagree lnao!
Edit: why not learn/grow?
Submitted January 09, 2019 at 03:50AM by Theslowcosby777 http://bit.ly/2Cc0gVG
No comments:
Post a Comment