The problem with "Enlightenment"

I have a problem with "Enlightenment". Specifically people's claims of reaching it. While I have no doubt people have enlightening experiences, I feel that when people refer to their own enlightenment it is often driven by ego, and therefore contradicts their claim as they make it.

I feel like this is most commonly seen with Zen teachers, authors and Zen "masters". Many of whom make a living from retreats, books and classes so need everyone else to know how "enlightened" they are to drum up business. But this does seem quite juxtaposed, possibly even contradictory. I actually cringe whenever I hear someone talk about how enlightened they are. It's like having a conversation with an infomercial salesman.

I understand that people need to make a living. And there are certainly less honourable ways to do that than running Zen retreats and writing Zen books. And I'm also greatful for these resources being available. But couldn't we tone it down with the ego?

I mean, does anyone really want to learn from some Hollywood "Zen master" who walks around telling everyone how good they are?

I would much prefer to learn Zen from someone who can also admit mistakes and failings. Or even someone who is not aware of the fact they are teaching me Zen in day to day interactions.

Anyone else on the same page?

Submitted December 21, 2017 at 05:28PM by Zenseaking http://ift.tt/2z8KOWS