You are basically demanding that someone - who values the public record - should come in and make sure that anyone who reads your slander/incorrect facts knows that someone smart thinks that you're an idiot, then future generations wont have to rely on current guru's, they can rely on the public record of facts.
its too bad the public record doesn't have someone that fact checks, so anyone here can muju it up and then have people think they are correct. Someone who sees this as how it works might feel like protecting the record, eternal dispute with wrong people who wanna learn. it doesnt help if ewk thinks that you cannot be saved, because then he wont announce the extending of his hand and you'll miss it if you're not ready at the time you read the post, to open up to the idea that there may be ideas you have yet to consider that will contribute to your mastery.
the 'idiot' part is agreed on and traded for, when you ASSERT what IS zen (zen doesn't have an 'is', it has a reality).
i say this because it doesnt necessarily mean he is emotional about this in any way, we do not know how humans work and cannot define motivations
Even if you are just seeking resolution by reading and thinking (so you're not at fault for misusing 'zen'), the seeking can be unlearned and then honest sincerity manifests because you are not scared of not protecting your self.
you look away from the road and calm you own hyper vigilance. This is attachment.
what does attachment mean to you?
Submitted August 21, 2016 at 05:50AM by mackowski http://ift.tt/2b8w0eS
No comments:
Post a Comment